2nd Amendment Infringment, TX Legislature

Texas Sovereignty Act SB3 13 & HB 384

Honest Folks I have been somewhat frustrated, disgusted and annoyed, the Legislature will be in session for 140 day, already some 40ish days have gone by and very little has been done, except for honoring people, holidays and events……read the House & Senate Journals and see for yourself what has been done.

I kind of had a sense that when the Legislature came into session on Jan. 10, that there would be immediate actions on some of the most egregious issues needing dealt with. Like border shut down, reigning in the Governor on his over reaching unscientific covid mandates. Well, my bubble has been busted!!

Thousands pouring in daily! Where is this border that is being built, surely it should be slowing illegals down if it’s there!? Why hasn’t an “invasion” been declared by Governor Abbott yet?! I truly, thought Mr. Abbott was my best friend, I received 10 – 15 text messages daily during the Primary asking for $’s so he could do his job. Well with over 70 million $’s in his chest he should be have that whole wall of protection up and re-fortified! Why do we need to send $’s so our elected reps can do their job isn’t that what they are elected for??

As of February 26:

House Bills filed : Number of Bills: 3,328 : see bills filed filed:

Senate Bills filed: Number of Bills: 1,501: See bills filed:

House Committee Members have been appointed by the House Speaker Dade Phelan who was voted into Speaker office (by all but 3 House Members) has managed to appoint 9 Democrats as Committee Chairs, this is like putting the coyote in charge of the hen house!

NOTE***Those Republican candidates that worked hard to get elected and then voted to put Mr. Phelan in as Speaker knew he was going to continue the practice of putting dems as head of key committees still voted him in as Speaker! There are only 3 that did not vote for him so it’s easy to know who did vote him in!

What is the purpose of the Republican Platform if the elected will not follow the platform? The Speaker gave many $’s to members campaigns, shouldn’t this be a conflict of interest??? Where is the censure of the Republican Party?

The one Chair that seems the most obnoxious to me is Joe Moody – D- from El Paso, being in charge of the House Jurisprudence. This committee pertains to all matters of criminal law.

Mr. Moody promotes: Black lives matter, red-flag laws, gun confiscation proposals, creating a registry of gun sales, soft on crime, against the death penalty. Has authored 42 bills.

Again! Why even has a party platform?


In order to push back on the Federal Government unconstitutional OVER – reach/spending/regulations/legislations/taxation using all the unelected 3 letter agencies, States need to take back our Sovereignty!

Please contact your Senator and House Representative on the urgency of supporting the Texas Sovereignty Bill

Authored by Bob Hall

It is SB 313, has been filed, read, and given to the Committee of State of Affairs

It’s Companion is HB 384 and is identical

The reason we need these bills passed is for the push back on the Federal Government, it reminds our Legislators they have this States Rights power, it reminds our Sheriffs that took an oath to the Constitution they are the last line of defense, that no federal agency can enter Texas because we are Sovereign and harass, arrest Texans without the permission of State and local permission. That would mean a proper warrant would be needed! This gives the Sheriff the authority to arrest any federal agency that does not follow procedure and inform the Sheriff first.

Please write to your Senator remember (Bastrop has been redistricted) our new Senator is Swertner. This is an important bill for protection of Texans. We want our Sovereignty back!

Write your House Representative let him/her know the importance of this bill.

For talking points read the bill, it isn’t long or hard to understand.

For more information on Speaker Phelan’s priorities The Texas Tribune has reported on a few of them. I think these are important but they are NOT the crucial issues that need dealt with first. If the border was dealt with some of these issues would be taken care of…..except for the “Democratic goals like the extension of Medicaid eligibility for new mothers to one year and the exemption of feminine hygiene products and diapers from sales taxes, in a nod to the bipartisan tone he has set for the chamber.” However, I would question how many of these mothers are legally is this State?

Happy Watching the TX Legislature – Please feel free to give comments, add info, or any research done that you would like to share.

If we all do a little, a lot will get done!


Terry Wareham – Bastrop County TEA Party

Uncategorized, World Health Assembly

World Health 75th Assembly – Elimination of U.S. Sovereignty Healthcare Make Your Voice Heard!

From: Bastrop County TEA Party Terry Wareham, May 13, 2022

This article explains what the World Health Assembly is and how to take a stand. These are changes the Biden administration has been secretly hiding. These 13 amendments were announced on the Federal Register on May 6, comments were open & closed the same day, with only certain minorities being invited. (Not sure how that can happen?) These are to be voted on May 27-28 in Geneva Switzerland. The U.S delegates being sent are the heads of HHS.

If passed, and it is believed they have the votes, will take effect in 6 months, November. Anthony Fauci is saying there will be another pandemic (strain) in the fall!

****This is an existing treaty. Since only the 13 amendments are being revised, this does NOT require a vote from our Congress!!!!

We will be giving our health sovereignty to a World Health Organization of dictators!

Please take the time to alert your Congress/Senate. Send to everyone you know.


Stakeholder Comment Session: embly/74090/

The letter in the Stakeholder Comment can be reworded a bit to send out to Representatives and anyone you can think of! There is not much time to get the word out!

How to take a Stand Against World Health:

World Health Assembly:

United Nations:

Who/What is the World Health Assembly?

The World Health Assembly (WHA) is the governing body meeting of the World Health Organization (WHO), the technical health agency of the United Nations  . The WHA takes place each May at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, and is attended by delegations from all 194 Member States. During the one week meeting, countries agree to resolutions, adopt action plans, supervise finances, review and approve the proposed budgets, discuss key public health issues, and determine the policies of the organization.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services leads the U.S. delegation to WHA.


Key Issues to Understand

On January 18th 2022, the United States Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the IHR. These amendments give control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state. The Director-General communicated the text of the proposed amendments on 20 January 2022, via a circular letter to State Parties. 

The proposed IHR amendments also cede control to WHO “regional directors,” who are given the authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC). Moreover, the proposed amendments allow the Director-General to ring an international alarm bell, by unilaterally issuing an “Intermediate Public Health Alert (IPHA).”

Properly understood, the proposed IHR amendments are directed towards establishing a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management. Consistent with a top-down view of governance, the public will not have opportunities to provide input or criticism concerning the amendments. This, of course, is a direct violation of the basic tenets of democracy and can be compared to the separate new pandemic treaty.

Summary of Selected Proposed Amendments to the IHR

The WHO intends to amend 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59

  1. Increased surveillance: Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.
  2. 48-hour deadline: Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states. 
  3. Secret sources: Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
  4. Weakened Sovereignty: Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state,  the Director-General may (not must) consult with the  WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.
  5. Rejecting the amendments: Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state has six months to reject them. This means November, this year. If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full.  Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no force and effect.

The World Council for Health’s Position On Proposed IHR Amendments

The WCH opposes the unnecessary and dystopian move toward centralized control of public health. This proven harmful model assumes that only one entity, WHO, understands how to manage the health policy of every state – and by implication, the health of each and every individual. It also assumes, incorrectly, that Big Pharma’s controversial model of medicine which is the WHO’s preferred model – is the expert guide to better health and wellness. 

These proposed IHR amendments will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly, which will take place in Geneva, May 22 to 28, 2022. The official agenda item is 16.2. It is not clear if the event will be broadcast for transparency. Thus, the WCH believes that it is essential to campaign against the proposed amendments and to build alternative pathways.

Why People Must Take Action Together

Due to the influence of private money at the WHO, a review in the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy stated that the corruption of the WHO is the “biggest threat to the world’s public health of our time.” This is particularly true in relation to WHO drug recommendations, including its “list of essential medicines,” which a growing number of people believe is biased and unreliable. 

Moreover, even though WHO’s documents highlight voice, agency, and social participation as drivers of equity and democracy, it is unknown World Health Assembly delegates who get to make decisions for us. To date, 13 days away from the World Health Assembly 75, the secretive list of each country’s delegates has been not been published. This is censorship.

Given consistent evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by various industries, its usefulness as a guide to public health must be critically re-evaluated, while alternative paradigms and models for ethical health guidance and human rights are built.

International Health Regulations


The International Health Regulations (IHR) was adopted by the 58th WHA in 2005 thru Resolution WHA58.3.194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005. They enable the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) if it decides that an infectious disease outbreak has occurred in a member state, but with the consent of the member state.

The World Council for Health (WCH) acknowledges this aspect of the current regulations because it recognizes the sovereignty of nations that adopted the IHR.


The International Health Regulations (IHR) are: an international legal instrument (WHA58.3) that covers measures for preventing the transnational spread of infectious diseases. This could also be interpretated as pandemics of : gun violence, climate change or any emergency to health to shut down.

Purpose and Scope: “to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade”.

Key facts

  • The IHR is legally binding on 196 countries, including the 194 WHO Member States.
  • The IHR  require countries to designate a National IHR Focal Point for communications with WHO, to establish and maintain core capacities for surveillance and response, including at designated points of entry.
  • IHR introduce important safeguards to protect the rights of travelers and other persons in relation to the treatment of personal data, informed consent and non-discrimination in the application of health measures.
  • 100% of States Parties – All 196 States Parties have reported on IHR indicators at least once in recent years.
  • More than 440 experts at the WHO – Rosters of experts established by the WHO Director-General under IHR include more than 440 experts.
  • 83% high-risk countries – 83% of high-risk countries in the Index of Risk Management have interagency preparedness plans.

Doctors Doing Early Covid Treatments

Undoing the mess government intervention has made in our healthcare!

And Informed consent!

Excellent audio! Fifteen doctors met to write the declaration against unprecedented government interference on one size fits all vaccine. The manifesto covers patient relationships and the the right to practice according to their Hippocratic Oath. The focus is on early treatment with a Declaration of Physician Independence against patient relationships that are being altered and blocked by barriers put in place by governments, employers, pharmacies, etc. the freedom of physicians to practice as they see fit without being censured! On the audio three of those Doctors Malone, Gessling, Cole are speaking out!

Sept.13,2021 Show: The links below from the Warroom are in 3 segments.


Video from the Warroom :

Update from Dr. Cole:

About the doctors: A little info on each. Warning, the media has fact checked them and found most everything I could find to be partly false, false or just plane nut jobs giving misinformation. So please do your due diligence!

Dr. Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA vaccines, while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. His research was continued at Vical in 1989, where the first in-vivo mammalian experiments were designed by him.

Dr. Heather Gessling: Dr. Heather Gessling, MD is a family medicine specialist in Columbia, MO. She currently practices at MMG Family Medicine and is affiliated with Ellis Fischel Cancer Center.

Dr. Ryan Cole: CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, one of the largest independent labs in the State of Idaho. Dr. Cole is a Mayo Clinic trained Board Certified Pathologist.  Board Certified in anatomic and clinical pathology. He has expertise in immunology and virology and also has subspecialty expertise in skin pathology.


America’s Frontline Doctors :

Informed Consent Action Network – ICAN A wealth of Info:

“The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the federal department in which all federal health agencies, including CDC, FDA, and NIH, are located. In October 2017, ICAN sent HHS a letter demanding that it explain serious and dangerous shortcomings in vaccine safety. The health agencies responded by letter in early 2018 and ICAN sent a follow-up in December 2018.”

Also, You have a right to a complaint process to theTexas Medical Board

When non medical (businesses, employers etc.) demand you receive treatments that are not based on your doctor recommendations, religion, conscience be sure to write complaints to your elected representative, Attorney General Office, Governor and even to the Medical Board, let the MB investigate your complaint against those mandates being pushed by unlicensed folks!


HR 3860 Are Military are Not Lab Rats

Please contact the Committee of Armed Forces and your Representatives. The mandate is already being implemented, it may not be enough time to get it stopped, the wheels of our Congress only roll quickly when it needs trillion$ bills for over-spending! But at the very least make your voice heard on this careless one size fits all vaccine!

Below are articles with links for your info.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has commanded all military not vaccinated with Covid 19 to begin immediately vaccinating. Many military members about 800,000 have not received the vax. Those refusing are facing court martial or dishonorable discharge. Let’s also add to those that refuse the concept of Critical Race Theory, have already lost rank and pay, or court martial! Soon we will not have a military that honors their oath to defend and uphold the Constitution if all those honoring their oath are count martialed!

I wonder why the mandate? We now know there are problems with the vaccine, also, it is the vaccinated that are the spreaders. Dr. Fauci does not seem to operate on science, but irrational changes of view. If I were in the volunteer military I would be screaming total incompetence from an administration that seems to have no cares for those under their authority! And, Fauci is unelected making decisions for our health like a would be monarch!

This link gives the the Military members voice/concerns on the issue of the vaccine:


H.R. 3860 is a 2 page bill that has been printed out for your convenience.

H. R. 3860

To prohibit any requirement that a member of the Armed Forces receive a vaccination against COVID-19.


Mr. Massie (for himself, Mr. Roy, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mrs. Greene of Georgia, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Perry, Mr. Steube, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. Mooney) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services


To prohibit any requirement that a member of the Armed Forces receive a vaccination against COVID-19.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


(a) Prohibition On Funding.—No Federal funds may be used to require a member of the Armed Forces to receive a vaccination against COVID-19.

(b) Prohibition On Adverse Action.—The Secretary concerned may not take any adverse action against a member of the Armed Forces because such member refuses to receive a vaccination against COVID-19.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term “adverse action” includes the following:

(A) Retaliation.

(B) Punishment.

(C) Disparate treatment.

(D) A requirement to wear a mask.

(E) A requirement to reside in substandard housing.

(2) The term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.


Constitutional Authority:

[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 103 (Monday, June 14, 2021)]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office []
H.R. 3860.
Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant
to the following:
Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 & Article I, Section 8,
Clause 1, which together constitute the power of the purse
vested solely in Congress, and Article I, Section 7, which
gives Congress the power to raise and support Armies and
provide and maintain a Navy.
[Page H2746]

About Constitutional Authority Statements:

On January 5, 2011, the House of Representatives adopted an amendment to House Rule XII. Rule XII, clause 7(c) requires that, to be accepted for introduction by the House Clerk, all bills (H.R.) and joint resolutions (H.J.Res.) must provide a document stating “as specifically as practicable the power or powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the bill or joint resolution.”Close

On June 14, 2021 HR 3860 was introduced to the House and referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. There it still remains! Quick action is needed, our service members need to know they are not forgotten!

This is the better link for contacting committee members:

This link gives more info on the Committee:

CONTACT Committee On Armed Services
2216 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington,  DC   20515-6035
(202) 225-4151

Quote: Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY-4)   

“The military Anthrax vaccine immunization program (AVIP) that began in the late 90’s was a debacle that, according to the GAO and congressional testimony, led to many departures of highly trained service members.

Let’s not repeat history!”

Nueremberg Code: What is it? When and how does it apply? Is it law?

Just by stating something is false does not make it so. USA today is citing myths that are false without any real evidence. Also, how can the COVID 19 vx which is really mNRA now be used for the Delta Variant? This article covers the need for the COVID 19 vx for the Delta Variant.

Secretary of Defense: you can google the mandates and read them. Copy and paste to this email crashes.


Texas HB 3 Texas Pandemic Response Act



The Texas Legislature is in session and there is much work to be done.
Writing letters to your representatives, making phone calls and even possibly going to the Capitol!

This action call is regarding HB 3.
“An Act relating to state and local government responses to a pandemic disaster; creating a criminal offense.”
Short Title:  The Texas Pandemic Response Act

Bill authored by:  Burrows
This bill is 9 pages long… the governor more authority that previously had.  And not just the governor but local representatives also with just as much power!

“Pandemic disaster” means the occurrence or imminent threat of an outbreak of an infectious disease that spreads to a significant portion of the population of multiple countries or the world and that threatens widespread of severe damage, injury, or loss of life or property in this resulting from any natural or man-made cause related to the outbreak.

By executive order a state of pandemic disaster can be issued if the governor determines that a state of pandemic disaster is occurring in this state or that the occurrence or threat of a pandemic disaster is imminent.

This bill makes it the responsibility of  the governor for meeting the dangers to this state and the residents of this state presented by a pandemic disaster.

What iimminent threat could a governor want to keep Texans safe from??  What if the common cold, cedar fever?  These can be real problems for some folks!
He/she must give a description:
of the nature of the disaster
areas effected or threatened
conditions causing
How can any governor predict  a disease?  The area it will threaten?  And the conditions causing?

Why wasn’t covid “pandemic” the responsibility of all those practicing in the medical field?  Instead of the Governor stating we would be masked, distanced & locked down until a vaccine was available?  Especially, when there wasn’t one.

Why were treatments withheld that either caused the virus to be less sever or not contracted at all?  Why weren’t people encouraged to take supplements to help build their immune systems up?  Some that tested positive could not be treated unless they had pneumonia!  They were just told to go home!  Go home and do what????  Wait until they got worse, lhad to be hospitalized then report on those rising numbers to keep  Texas locked down longer!!

What government representative has ANY authority to stop treatments?  To issue pharmacies not to fill scripts of medicines for treatments?
OR….to decide what medical procedures were important or not?
There were doctors that spoke out and lost there jobs!!!!
The governor decided who was essential and who was non-essential!
Who could work and who could not work!
Which businesses were essential or not!

NO GOVERNOR SHOULD HAVE THAT AUTHORITY!  AND this bill gives more power than what we endured thru covid!!!

So then at what point would a governor be able to tell when there is no more immiinent threat???  That could be years, just like we are hearing now!

No one person should have as much power as this bill would give!  Reminder if this bill were to pass it would be in effect for any Governor that is in office!

Please read this bill!   Texas Legislature Online – 87(R) History for HB 3
It is in State Affairs committee
Hearing testimony March 11   Schedule Display (

Instructions:  For those persons who will be testifying, information for in-person witness registration, can be found here: 

A live video broadcast of this hearing will be available here: 

Instructions related to public access to the meeting location and health and safety protocols for attending this meeting are available here:

Texas residents who wish to electronically submit comments related to agenda items on this notice without testifying in person can do so until the hearing is adjourned by

Then be sure and write your House representative and Senator..  This is not a good bill, and needs stopped in committee!

Reigning in government must start now!

Terry Wareham
Bastrop County Party