2nd Amendment Infringment, Uncategorized

Gun Confiscation Coming in Virginia?

Happy New Year!

Too bad when the old year ends all the problems of that year don’t end with it so the new year is able to start with a clean slate!  But, that isn’t reality.

When I first got started in the TEA Party one on the original founders of this group came to me and said, “now Terry, you only want to deal with taxation, don’t go off the rails, the taxation is due to over-spending!”  Well, that gentleman has passed and I agreed with him, still do.  But, in all reality what is NOT taxed due to over spending?

Over-spending is a reaping of our elected representatives on every level of government, whether it be Local, State or Federal due to greedy mis-managment and over reach of power/authority.  All levels have their hands out for federal dollars, when the feds give dollars not theirs to give we the people end up paying higher taxes, we then  become so OVER – regulated, legislated thru taxation and are passing a great amount of debt onto our children, grandchildren & great grandchildren!

When legislators (our elected representatives) can over step their job description in over spending why not be able to over step in infringing on the Rights of citizens also??

Consider the State of Virginia,

The Governor and Virginia Legislature are considering a State wide confiscation of guns as the Democrats will be in control as of January 1, 2020.

Please listen to the the bills being proposed, if this feat is accomplished consider a wide sweep across the the United States.  We should in every State of this Union be appalled at the audacity and boldness of the Governor and the legislature of Virginia.

Please get active in protecting our Constitution and Bill of Rights in 2020!

We cannot afford to allow this to happen in the United States of America with a Republic form of government!

Only under a democratic, socialist, communist form of government does this happen.  It appears there are many in our government that believe that is what we are!  We the people have never voted to change our form of government, let’s remove those from office that will not follow the original Constitution.

I truly hope and pray this will be a happy new year!


Terry Wareham – Bastrop County TEA Party

Matthew 12:29 How can a strong man be robbed, unless he is first tied up!  Then he can be robbed!




Scott Bowers Agenda

Speaker – Scott Bowers October 21

 Bastrop County TEA Party  
Yes!!! Still Taxed, Enough, Already!!!

Scott Bowers Tour October 21

Hampton Inn & Suites   

  240 South Hasler Boulevard

Bastrop, TX  78602

Click on the Eventbrite link to order your:

Tickets (free) for:
Lunch, Evening,
The afternoon topic:

How Socialism is Impacting our Country and the Church

Evening:     The Deep State and The Importance of 2020                                                                                                                       Also:

Invited Guest Dwayne Stovall – Candidate for Senate
against Incumbent John Cornyn.
Time:  3:00 pm – 4:00 pm
This invitation is for Mr. Stovall to introduce himself, explain his platform and you to ask questions.                         (No ticket is required) 


Please get the word out for this event!
Invite your friends, family, Church.

Mr. Bowers and his family are touring across the United States to educate as many Americans as possible to the seriousness of our situation!

This is not a comfortable time in our Nation and we need to take some action!  Let’s show the Bowers Family that we do care about our Nation, and are not ready to allow democratic socialists to turn us away from the Constitutional Republic we are!                                                       (Constitution Article 4, Sec. 4)

Trailer:  AgendaDocumentary.com

If you have not seen the documentaries watch the trailer for a bit of background.

Get informed and take action the strong man is being tied up!
Let’s pack both sessions!

Terry Wareham – Bastrop County TEA

Matthew 12:29  “…..how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man?  Then he can rob his house.”



Texas(ten) Ballot Propositions 2019

Bastrop County TEA Party =
Taxed, Enough, Already
November 5, 2019 is the official voting day.
Early voting begins Tuesday October 22
Bastrop County :
bastropvotes.org for poling locations and times.
All other Counties check with your County Elections Administrator.
Well this is our odd number year 2019, and in those odd years Texans vote for Constitutional amendments. This year we will be voting for 10 (ten) propositions to become amendments that will give Texans the opportunity to change our Texas Constitution or not!

The following 10 propositions will appear on the ballot in the order below.
In order to appear on the ballot, the proposed amendments must first be approved by a two-thirds vote, 100 votes in the state House and 21 votes in the state Senate.
Then a drawing ceremony is held for the placement of these propositions on the ballot by the Deputy Secretary of State Joe Esparsa.

I have each proposition written out along with a Ballotpedia link and what a “yes” or “no” vote will mean.
Ballotpedia has a very extensive breakdown of the proposition, how the Legislatures voted, which part of the TX Constitution is effected + other info.
Broken down for each proposition is the yes, no vote meaning and the link for that prop.

So happy reading….please do your due diligence investigations and don’t just take the word of Ballotpedia! These props will change how our form of government will work or not!!!!

Terry Wareham – Head – Bastrop County TEA Party

You can also find these posted on Bastrop County TEA Party on Facebook
And by tomorrow : MeWe                                                                                                                                                       Lindklin


1 (HJR 72)
“The constitutional amendment permitting a person to hold more than one office as a municipal judge at the same time.”

A “yes” vote supports this amendment to allow persons to hold more than one office as an elected or appointed municipal judge in more than one municipality at the same time.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thereby allowing a person to hold more than one office as an appointed, but not an elected, municipal judge in more than one municipality at the same time.



Proposition 2 (SJR 79)
“The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $200 million to provide financial assistance for the development of certain projects in economically distressed

A “yes” vote supports this amendment to allow the Texas Water Development Board to issue bonds on a continuing basis, but not exceeding $200 million in total principal at any time, for water supply and sewer service in areas defined as economically distressed.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thus discontinuing bond funding for the Texas Water Development Board’s economically distressed areas program.
Proposition 3 (HJR 34)
“The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for a temporary exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion of the appraised value of certain property damaged by a disaster.”

A “yes” vote supports this amendment to allow political subdivisions to provide temporary property tax exemptions in areas that the governor declared as disaster areas.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thus continuing to allow property reappraisals following disasters but not tax exemptions.
Texas Proposition 4, the Prohibit State Income Tax on Individuals Amendment
Proposition 4 (HJR
“The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual income tax, including a tax on an individual’s share of partnership and unincorporated association income”
A “yes” vote supports this amendment to prohibit the state from levying an income tax on individuals.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thus continuing to allow the state to enact a tax on individuals in the future through a statewide referendum.
Proposition 5 (SJR 24)
“The constitutional amendment dedicating the revenue received from the existing state sales and use taxes that are imposed on sporting goods to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Texas Historical Commission to protect Texas’ natural areas, water quality, and history by acquiring, managing, and improving state and local parks and historic sites while not increasing the rate of the state sales and use taxes.”

A “yes” vote supports this constitutional amendment to dedicate revenue from the sales tax on sporting goods to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Texas Historical Commission.

A “no” vote opposes this constitutional amendment, thus allowing the legislature to decide how much of the revenue from the sales tax on sporting goods is allocated to the state Parks and Wildlife Department and the state Historical Commission.
Proposition 6 (HJR 12)
“The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to increase by $3 billion the maximum bond amount authorized for the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.”

“yes” vote supports this amendment to allow the legislature to increase the maximum amount of bonds for the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas from $3 billion to $6 billion.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thereby keeping the maximum amount of bonds for the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas at $3 billion.

Proposition 7 (HJR 151)
“The constitutional amendment allowing increased distributions to the available school fund.”

A “yes” vote supports this amendment to allow the General Land Office and State Board of Education to each transfer $600 million from the Permanent School Fund’s lands and properties proceeds to the Available School Fund each year.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thereby keeping the amount of revenue that the General Land Office is permitted to transfer from the Permanent School Fund’s lands and properties proceeds to the Available School Fund at $300 million per year and excluding the State Board of Education from making transfers from the fund’s funds and properties proceeds.

Proposition 8 (HJR 4)
“The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the flood infrastructure fund to assist in the financing of drainage, flood mitigation, and flood control projects.”

A “yes” vote supports this constitutional amendment to create the Flood Infrastructure Fund, which the Texas Water Development Board would use to provide financing for flood drainage, mitigation, and control projects.

A “no” vote opposes this constitutional amendment to create the Flood Infrastructure Fund.
Proposition 9 (HJR 95)
“The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation precious metal held in a precious metal depository located in this state.”

A “yes” vote supports this amendment to allow the legislature to exempt precious metals held in precious metal depositories from property taxation.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment, thereby continuing to permit taxation of precious metals held in precious metal depositories as property.
Proposition 10 (SJR 32)
“The constitutional amendment to allow the transfer of a law enforcement animal to a qualified caretaker in certain circumstances.”

“yes” vote supports this amendment to allow for the transfer of a law enforcement animal, such as a dog or horse, to the animal’s handler or another qualified caretaker if the transfer is in the animal’s best interest.

A “no” vote opposes this amendment to allow for the transfer of a law enforcement animal, such as a dog or horse, to the animal’s handler or another qualified caretaker if the transfer is in the animal’s best interest.
For more information and resources for voting in Texas, visit:

Texas Legislature on Line: https://capitol.texas.gov/
Other duties by the Secretary of State: https://www.sos.state.tx.us/about/duties.shtml
Why can voters only vote at the polls? Why don’t we have initiative and referendum?
Due to a 1914 amendment that reads in part:

“To amend Section 1 of Article 3 of the Constitution of the State of the people, or reserve to them, the power to propose laws and to enact or reject the same at the polls, and to approve or reject at the polls any Act of the Legislature.
Be it resolved by the Legislature of the State of Texas: That Section 1 of Article 3 of the Constitution of the State of Texas be amended to read: Section 1. The legislative power of this State shall be vested in a Senate and House of Reprsentatives, which, together, shall be styled “The Legislature of the State of Texas,” but the people reserve to themselves, power, as herein provided, to propose laws and to enact or reject the same at the polls, and to approve or reject at the polls any law, or any part of any law, enacted by the Legislature. The Legislature shall provide by law for submitting to the vote of the people, upon the petition of twenty per cent. of the qualified voters of the State the enactment of laws and the approval or rejection of any law enacted by the Legislature. “
https://lrl.texas.gov/scanned/sessionLaws/33-0/SJR_12.pdfTexas, so as to give to


Fundraiser for Future Event Projects


Please click on the link below, this link will open up the T-shirt page for my fundraiser for future Bastrop County TEA Party projects.

I don’t often ask for $’s, however, the TEA Party mission is to get folks like you informed with information to make smart political decisions!

I have some great speakers lined up and need funds to pay expenses.


Thank you!

Terry Wareham – Bastrop County TEA Party



Ilegal Immigration

2019 Remembrance Tour Candid Talk About Illegal Immigration

                                                          Bastrop County TEA Party                                                                                                               T = taxed, E = enough, A = ready!
Greetings To All!

The Bastrop County TEA Party will be Hosting the:
2019 Remembrance Tour
Candid Talk About Illegal Immigration

Date: July 22, 2019
Time: 7:00 – 9:00 pm (lite refreshments starting at 6:30)
Location: First National Bank, 489 Hwy 71 Bastrop, TX

RSVP is required Limited Seating
Please send RSVP thru this email @ bastropteaparty@gmail.com

Please join Speaker: Maria Espinoza, Nat’l Director,
The Remembrance Project

Maria lived and worked in Washington, DC, for 2 years and is now back home in Texas sharing her knowledge and experiences.
Her group, The Remembrance Project brought the Angel Moms, Dads and Families to President Trump.
The President created the VOICE Office as a promise to Maria and TRP. With a National Emergency at our southern border, where do we go from here?
What more can we do to save lives? Join us, let’s talk!

Thank you!
Terry Wareham – Bastrop County TEA Party

Limited Government * Fiscal Responsibility * Personal Responsibility * The Rule of Law *
National Sovereignty * Constitution as the supreme law.

To promote education, civic involvement, open discussions and peaceable assembly on local, state and national issues.
We urge citizens to take appropriate action to implement these ideals, especially as being active voters!

Copyright © 2019 Bastrop County TEA Party, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you either signed or requested to be on our list.

Our mailing address is:
Bastrop County TEA Party
Smithville, TX 78957

Add us to your address book

Justices, Uncategorized, Voting

November 6, 2018 General Election Candidate Info

Candidate Info:

The following Justices serve these 24 Counties:
Bastrop, Bell, Blanco, Burnett, Caldwell, Coke, Comal, Concho,
Fayettte, Hays, Irion, Lee, Llano, McCulloch, Milam, Mills,
Runnels, San Saba, Schleicher, Sterling, Tom Green, Travis, Williamson

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS: 9 Justices, Statewide, Based in Austin
Place 2: Steven Kirkland (D) v. Jimmy Blacklock* (R)
Place 4: R.K. Sandill (D) v. John Devine* (R)
Place 6: Kathy Cheng (D) v. Jeff Brown* (R)
3rd Court of Appeals: 6 Justices, 24 Counties, Based in Austin
Place 2: Edward Smith (D) v. Cindy Olson Bourland* (R)
Place 3: Chari Kelly (D) v. Scott Field* (R)
Place 5: Thomas J. Baker (D) v. David Puryear* (R)
Place 6: Gisela Triana (D) v. Mike Toth* (R)
Recently I attended a dinner hosted by Aleata Oeser in the Colony. She had the best line up of candidate Justices I have seen in one place at one time it was great.

The below links give you information on each candidate, some history about the Justices and how our Court system works here in Texas.

The longest video (29 minutes) with each candidate explaining who they are and why they are running.
Turn your volume up, some of the audio is a little hard to hear.
Texas Supreme Court Justices (5minutes)

Justice Brown Explains the 3 level system Court System (13:56 minutes)
Supreme Court Cases: cases important to the jurisprudence of the State

The following links are comparisons given by Texas Judges:
Comparisons of all Justices running in the State of Texas : http://texasjudges.org/judicial-comparisons/
Texans for Lawsuit Reform : www.tlrpac.com

This election is definitely NOT a stay at home election! More than ever we need to make our voices heard at the ballot box. The nasty circus performance that left some of us appalled at the dishonesty, destruction and the means by which that destruction was obtained should have us all on high alert and ready to help drain the swamp!

As my better half Andy has stated:
What is going on is a fundamental change to the United States of America, innocent until proven guilty is a basic principle that our Nation exists on. If Kavanaugh is not confirmed because of accusations, and he is found guilty based on accusations and not evidence, we have lost that fundamental defense and principal which makes us the United States of America! The next step following is gun control, that would be another lost defense then we may as well just get in line to the gas chambers because we are going down that road.

If we all do a little bit, a lot will be accomplished!

Terry Wareham
Head of the Bastrop County TEA Party                                                                                              bastropteaparty@gmail.com




Elimination of Straight Party Voting In Texas

HB 25 Elimination of Straight Party Voting

Author of HB 25 – Ron Simmons – Sponsor – Senator Kelly Hancock                                                            Signed by Governor Greg Abbott                                                                                                         Becomes effective September 1, 2020                                                                                    Repeals the following provisions of the Election Code:                                                                          Section: 1.005(20)                    Section: 52.071               Section: 64.004                                      Section:  65.007                        Section: 122.001(b)        Section: 124.001                                     Section: 124.003(d)                  Section: 124.063(d)        Section: 232.050(d)

What is straight-party voting?

Going to the polls to vote, there is a long column of candidates from each party.  The national nominees start at the top, then the state candidates, last are the local; clerks, county officials, judges which includes the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals…..Texas’s highest criminal court!

Election code, sec.1.005(20) defines a straight-party vote as a vote by a single mark, punch, or other action by the voter for all the nominees for one political party and no other candidates.

Why/Who would anyone want to eliminate such an easy step that assures that every candidate is voted for in that party?

Supporters of this bill believe it would encourage voters to more carefully consider the candidates.  Straight-party voting pulls voter’s attention away from down-ballot candidates for certain offices that most directly affect the voter. Most voters may know more about the national candidates, and a one punch vote would then cause down ballot candidates to be elected that were poorly vetted.  It is also these down ballot races that most directly affect the lives of voters on a more daily basis.

In some cases one punch causes voters to miss out on casting votes in non-partisan races or propositions.

Opponents of this bill say that party labels are an immediate set of boundaries that voters use to make their ballot decisions.  Eliminating one punch is more cumbersome, and voters should be able to vote easily.

Also believe the bill could make Texas vulnerable to lawsuits as in the August 1, 2016 Michigan bill.  A federal district court blocked the bill with higher courts declining to hear the case.  The decision to block was based on evidence showing high correlations between the size of the African-American voting population within a district and use of straight-party voting.  This district historically faced longest wait times and eliminating one punch would result in African-American voters being impacted even greater.

What about this vetting issue on the down ballot?

I found an example from 1994.  I use this one example not to bash any party, because I know it happens frequently in both, it is just a good example!                                           Steve Mansfield challenged a Democrat for the highest seat on the states criminal court of Texas.   He operated his campaign from his car, motel, and push cards.  It is believed most of the 4.5 million Texans didn’t know who Steve Mansfield was, all they knew was the party affiliation “R” and being on the same ticket as George W. Bush.

As it turns out…..he used illicit drugs in his youth, paid a fine in Florida for practicing law without a license, his reputation included conning women through personal ads, married, divorced, negligent in child support, claimed he was born and raised in Texas, but, really born and raised in Massachusetts, and, was not a criminal lawyer at all.

How did such a candidate even get on the ballot….long story short, he was not vetted by the GOP!  It takes a lot of blind faith to just vote a straight party ticket hoping the party has chosen trustworthy, honorable men/women and not just by the letter in front of their name.

Down ticket  races should be considered the MOST important races as those are the ones that personally effect our daily lives.   Those local races have more influence over our daily lives in court judgements, child custody cases, TAXES.

There is an option!

NOW is the time to begin focusing on those local races.  Know who you are voting for, included in HB25, on line 24(c) states, “The secretary of state shall prescribe the form of the ballot to allow a voter to cast a vote in each federal, state, or local race in the election.  The ballot must allow a voter to write in the name of a candidate.”                           I don’t know the qualifications or if there is a deadline for write-ins……..but get to know this new law!  Contact the Secretary of State and your local Elections Administrator.

A little history on the highest Court in Texas:
All States including the District of Columbia have at least one supreme court….also, known as the court of last resort! The exceptions are Oklahoma and Texas which have a split court system.
The Texas split evolved from legal problems facing the State in 1876, and over the years has undergone changes through Constitutional Amendments in the Texas Constitution leading up to the Court as it is today.
The two Texas Supreme Courts – The Supreme Court of Texas, handles criminal cases, with eight Judges and one Presiding Judge.
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, handles civil and criminal cases, with five Justices and one Presiding Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals hears cases -has intermediate appellate jurisdiction of both civil and criminal cases appealed from the lower courts in the counties of their jurisdiction.
My point is……at your “last chance or resort” you want to make sure those Judges are making decisions based on the Texas Constitution and believe in the United States Constitution! And making sure those judges are not Judging from the “heart” based strictly on social justice and their emotions!
Let’s start giving the Judges that run some of our time and a little effort in learning about who they are and what they stand for!                                                                                             Even some campaign contributions would be helpful!

The Supreme courts do not hear trials of cases. They hear appeals of the decisions made in the lower trial or appellate courts.
These Courts are the LAST CHANCE OR RESORT for decisions made in the lower courts. (Folks don’t appeal to this Court for good decisions they think were made)!

Unfortunately, when it comes to voting on the bottom end of the ballot, (and these judges are DOWN at the bottom) folks either guess or don’t vote at all because they don’t want to put someone in office not known to them!                                                                             Remember! An absent vote could automatically place the other party in office!

NOW is the time to get involved!  These folks down ticket represent WE the people!

A few ways to do some vetting of your own:

Go to the Party’s website.  Read their Party Platform!  What issues do they stand on/or not?  If you like a candidate from the other side because they don’t believe in a few of the party planks, remember $’s to that candidate still goes to support that party.

If they are an incumbent, look up their past voting record.

My soapbox issue:                                                                                                                           Our elected representatives will only represent us as  responsibly, accountably, honestly as their constituents that elect them!  So if we their constituents don’t put forth any effort to elect good reps, why should they be good to their constituents?

GET INVOLVED IN THE VOTING PROCESS!  Swamps can’t be drained when voters keep plugging up the drain!

Terry Wareham – Bastrop County TEA Party